Self-initiated concept · Coursera · EdTech, course discovery · 8 min read

Helping learners pick the right course without the guesswork

Helping learners pick the right course without the guesswork

Helping learners pick the right course without the guesswork

I redesigned Coursera’s course discovery journey, from the home page to search, course listings and the course page, so learners can compare options and enroll with confidence instead of opening course after course.

I redesigned Coursera’s course discovery journey, from the home page to search, course listings and the course page, so learners can compare options and enroll with confidence instead of opening course after course.

My role

Senior product designer

I owned

UX research, product strategy, information architecture, interaction and UI design, prototyping

Timeline & platform

3 weeks · Coursera web (desktop)

DISCOVERY IN NUMBERS · SELF-INITIATED CONCEPT, NOT SHIPPED

3

3

3

learners interviewed in moderated think-aloud sessions

8

8

8

steps in the old journey from search to enrolling

7

7

7

pain points mapped to design opportunities

4

4

4

core pages redesigned, from home to course page

The redesigned course page, with the information learners decide on above the fold

The short version

Thirty seconds on what happened

Thirty seconds on what happened

Thirty seconds on what happened

The problem

Course cards hid what learners needed to decide: price, duration, skills and who teaches it. People opened course after course, went back, and compared options in their heads until they settled or gave up.

What I did

Ran three moderated user interviews, mapped the current journey, clustered findings into four themes and turned each pain point into a design opportunity before redesigning four core pages.

The outcome

A discovery flow that puts decision-making information up front: richer course cards, smarter search, sorting and filters, a personalised home and a course page that earns trust above the fold.

The problem

Coursera’s biggest strength is also its biggest UX challenge

Coursera’s biggest strength is also its biggest UX challenge

Coursera’s biggest strength is also its biggest UX challenge

Thousands of courses from hundreds of universities, for millions of learners. With that much choice, the learners I spoke to struggled to:

Thousands of courses from hundreds of universities, for millions of learners. With that much choice, the learners I spoke to struggled to:

01

Compare multiple courses side by side

02

Understand a course’s value quickly

03

Search efficiently

04

Trust the recommendations they were shown

05

Decide what to enroll in

Why it matters

Every extra click increased the likelihood of a learner abandoning their learning journey before it had even started.

Every extra click increased the likelihood of a learner abandoning their learning journey before it had even started.

Every extra click increased the likelihood of a learner abandoning their learning journey before it had even started.

Current journey

Eight steps, two dead ends, and the comparison happens in the learner’s head

Eight steps, two dead ends, and the comparison happens in the learner’s head

Eight steps, two dead ends, and the comparison happens in the learner’s head

I mapped how participants actually moved from search to enrolling. Confidence dropped every time they had to leave a page to find basic information.

I mapped how participants actually moved from search to enrolling. Confidence dropped every time they had to leave a page to find basic information.

Step 01

😃

😃

Search

Curious and motivated

Step 02

😐

😐

Browse

Cards don’t say enough

Step 03

😩

😩

Open a course

Has to dig for the basics

Step 04

😞

😞

Back to results

Loses context

Step 05

😖

😖

Open another course

Repeats the hunt

Step 06

😞

😞

Back again

Losing patience

Step 07

😕

😕

Compare mentally

Holding details in memory

Step 08

🙂

🙂

Enroll

Relieved, not confident

Issue

Too many clicks

Learners bounced between the listing and course pages just to gather the basics.

Issue

Missing information

Price, duration, skills and instructor weren’t on the course card.

Issue

Decision fatigue

Comparing courses relied on memory, so every choice felt risky.

Research

Three learners, one recurring story

Three learners, one recurring story

Three learners, one recurring story

I ran moderated interviews with open-ended questions, then a cognitive walkthrough where each participant looked for a course on Coursera while thinking aloud. It showed what they looked for, where they hesitated and what made them give up.

I ran moderated interviews with open-ended questions, then a cognitive walkthrough where each participant looked for a course on Coursera while thinking aloud. It showed what they looked for, where they hesitated and what made them give up.

Udit Kumar

M.Tech student, IIT Delhi · first time on Coursera

Looks for courses that deepen the subjects he’s studying.

What got in the way

Opened every course page and backed out to find the right one

Price, duration, skills and university weren’t on the card

Filters narrowed the list but didn’t make choosing easier

Rahul Vyas

Associate technical lead · 5+ years in full-stack engineering

Collects certifications to strengthen his resume.

What got in the way

Couldn’t sort by latest, trending or highest rated

Found the course page poorly organised

Pricing, his deciding factor, wasn’t on the card

Surbhi Kwatra

Software engineer, early in her career

Wants well-rated courses with certificates that level up her resume.

What got in the way

The home page felt generic despite her profile

The course page was far too long

A ‘free’ course asked for card details to start a subscription

Remote think-aloud sessions: participants searching for a course on Coursera

Synthesis

Four themes behind the drop-off

Four themes behind the drop-off

Four themes behind the drop-off

I clustered every observation with affinity mapping. Four themes explained almost all of the friction.

I clustered every observation with affinity mapping. Four themes explained almost all of the friction.

Decision making

Learners didn’t have the information they needed to decide.

Missing price

Missing skills

Missing duration

Discoverability

Finding the right course took too long.

Poor search

Poor filters

No sorting

Personalisation

The home page and recommendations ignored learners’ goals.

Generic home page

Weak recommendations

Information architecture

Course pages buried what mattered under a long scroll.

Course details

Long scroll

Opportunity map

Opportunity map

Opportunity map

Each pain point became a design opportunity, tied to the benefit it should create.

Pain point

Opportunity

Expected benefit

Missing price

→ Price on the card

Faster decisions

No sorting

→ Sort by rating, reviews and date

More relevant results

Poor search

→ Search suggestions

Faster discovery

Poor filters

→ Clearer, faceted filters

Easier narrowing

Generic home page

→ Goal-based modules

More relevant content

Weak recommendations

→ Recommended for you

Higher engagement

Long scroll

→ Key information above the fold

Quicker comprehension

Heuristic review

Where the current interface lets learners down

Where the current interface lets learners down

Where the current interface lets learners down

Alongside the interviews, I reviewed the live product page by page and tied each issue back to what participants told me.

Alongside the interviews, I reviewed the live product page by page and tied each issue back to what participants told me.

Home page

A profile card that never goes away

A profile card that never goes away

A profile card that never goes away

The ‘My learning profile’ card stays pinned and takes space without serving anyone’s goals

Course cards don’t carry enough information to spark interest or a decision

The layout gives learners little reason to explore

Course listing

Cards without the facts that decide

Cards without the facts that decide

Cards without the facts that decide

No price, no duration and no key skills on the card

Filters don’t meaningfully narrow the list

There’s no way to sort results

Course page

A long page that buries the essentials

A long page that buries the essentials

A long page that buries the essentials

The hero doesn’t build trust in the course or the provider

Lecture details, which learners rely on, sit far down the page

Long descriptions push the important information below the fold

Approach

Designing for faster decisions, not a visual refresh

Designing for faster decisions, not a visual refresh

Designing for faster decisions, not a visual refresh

Instead of restyling the interface, I focused on reducing the number of decisions learners had to make before enrolling. Six principles guided every screen.

Instead of restyling the interface, I focused on reducing the number of decisions learners had to make before enrolling. Six principles guided every screen.

01

Information first

Surface important information before learners open the course page.

02

Reduce cognitive load

Help learners compare courses without remembering details.

03

Recognition over recall

Make relevant information immediately visible.

04

Progressive disclosure

Reveal deeper information only when it’s needed.

05

Personalised discovery

Recommend courses aligned with each learner’s goals.

06

Fewer dead ends

Let learners compare and decide without bouncing between pages.

Information architecture

Information architecture

Information architecture

The old flow sent learners back to search after every course page. The new flow adds recommendations, smart suggestions and in-list comparison, so every step moves them forward.

Before

7 steps, 2 loops back to search

Home

→

Search

→

Course

→

Back

→

Search again

→

Course

→

Enroll

After

8 steps, no loops back

Home

→

Recommendations

→

Search

→

Smart suggestions

→

Course listing

→

Compare

→

Course details

→

Enroll

Key design decisions

Four pages, redesigned around the decision

Four pages, redesigned around the decision

Four pages, redesigned around the decision

Each redesign answers a specific pain point from research, and carries the information learners need to the moment they need it.

Each redesign answers a specific pain point from research, and carries the information learners need to the moment they need it.

01 · Home page

A home page that starts from the learner’s goals

A home page that starts from the learner’s goals

A home page that starts from the learner’s goals

Courses are arranged around the goals in the learner’s profile, so the first screen is already relevant.

Cards now show price, skills and rating up front

A dismiss control on ‘My learning profile’ once it stops adding value

Degree programmes get their own row, so they don’t crowd out courses

02 · Search

Suggestions that shorten the path to the right course

Suggestions that shorten the path to the right course

Suggestions that shorten the path to the right course

Search suggests related queries as learners type, and jumps straight to a course when the keywords match it exactly.

Related query suggestions while typing

A direct course result for exact matches

Fewer empty or irrelevant result pages

user experience

⌕

⌕

⌕

G

Google UX Design

Professional certificate · Google

⌕

User Experience

⌕

User Experience Design

⌕

User Experience Research and Design

⌕

User Experience: Research and Prototyping

03 · Course listing

Cards that carry the facts learners decide on

Cards that carry the facts learners decide on

Cards that carry the facts learners decide on

The listing does the comparison work, so learners no longer need to open each course to find the basics.

Price, duration and key skills on every card

Clearer, easier-to-use filters

Sorting by most relevant, most reviewed, highest rated and latest

04 · Course page

A course page that builds trust above the fold

A course page that builds trust above the fold

A course page that builds trust above the fold

The page leads with what learners decide on, and gets shorter so they reach it sooner.

A hero with the provider and enrol action builds trust from the first screen

What you’ll learn, skills and the course list move to the top

A shorter scroll keeps learners engaged

Expected impact

Designed to move the numbers that matter

Designed to move the numbers that matter

Designed to move the numbers that matter

These improvements target measurable product outcomes. For each one, here’s the change behind it and how I’d measure it after launch.

These improvements target measurable product outcomes. For each one, here’s the change behind it and how I’d measure it after launch.

Faster course discovery

Search suggestions, clearer filters and personalised recommendations cut the time spent browsing.

How I’d measure it

Time from first search to first course page

Easier comparison

Ratings, duration, price, skills and university on the card mean fewer trips into course pages.

How I’d measure it

Bounces from course pages back to results

Lower cognitive load

A clearer hierarchy and progressive disclosure make evaluating a course feel lighter.

How I’d measure it

Task success and time on task in usability tests

More confident choices

Key information up front helps learners understand a course’s value before enrolling.

How I’d measure it

Conversion from listing to enrollment

A more relevant home

Goal-based modules help learners find courses that fit their career plans.

How I’d measure it

Click-through on home recommendations

Less scrolling

Course pages surface skills, credibility, reviews and outcomes earlier in the journey.

How I’d measure it

Scroll depth before the enroll action

What I learned

Good educational products reduce uncertainty

Good educational products reduce uncertainty

Good educational products reduce uncertainty

Organising information isn’t enough. When learners trust what they see, choosing becomes easier and learning starts sooner.

Organising information isn’t enough. When learners trust what they see, choosing becomes easier and learning starts sooner.

“This project wasn’t about making Coursera look modern. It was about helping people make better decisions.”

“This project wasn’t about making Coursera look modern. It was about helping people make better decisions.”

“This project wasn’t about making Coursera look modern. It was about helping people make better decisions.”

Thanks for scrolling this far.

Most people don’t.

Open to Senior Product Design Roles

© 2026 Aditya Kashyap — designed with intent.

Last updated Oct 2026

New Delhi

Thanks for scrolling this far.

Most people don’t.

Open to Senior Product Design Roles

New Delhi

© 2026 Aditya Kashyap — designed with intent.

Last updated Oct 2026

Thanks for scrolling this far.

Most people don’t.

Open to Senior Product Design Roles

New Delhi

© 2026 Aditya Kashyap — designed with intent.

Last updated Oct 2026

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.